Which statement about protecting a band's logo is accurate?

Which statement about protecting a band's logo is accurate?

• A. A logo can be protected only by copyright
• B. A logo cannot be protected at all
• C. A logo can be protected by both copyright and trademark
• D. A logo is protected automatically without registration

Answer: (C)

Logos can be protected in two different ways because they serve two distinct functions: they are a creative design and they function as a brand identifier. Copyright protects the artistic expression of the logo—the actual graphic design, including shapes, colors, and layout—so long as it’s original and fixed in a tangible medium. This protection arises automatically when the logo is created, though registering the work can provide additional remedies and benefits. Trademark protection, on the other hand, covers the logo’s role in identifying the band’s goods or services in the marketplace. Trademarks can come from actual use or be secured by registration, and they help prevent others from confusing fans or buyers about who provided the goods or services. Because a logo can fulfill both roles, it can be protected by both copyright and trademark. The other statements miss one or both of these protections or imply that trademark rights aren’t needed, which isn’t accurate.

Logos can be protected in two different ways because they serve two distinct functions: they are a creative design and they function as a brand identifier. Copyright protects the artistic expression of the logo—the actual graphic design, including shapes, colors, and layout—so long as it’s original and fixed in a tangible medium. This protection arises automatically when the logo is created, though registering the work can provide additional remedies and benefits. Trademark protection, on the other hand, covers the logo’s role in identifying the band’s goods or services in the marketplace. Trademarks can come from actual use or be secured by registration, and they help prevent others from confusing fans or buyers about who provided the goods or services. Because a logo can fulfill both roles, it can be protected by both copyright and trademark. The other statements miss one or both of these protections or imply that trademark rights aren’t needed, which isn’t accurate.